Slalom

AI-assisted profiles that cut rewrite cycles and raise client-ready quality.

PROBLEM

Senior leaders couldn’t present consultant profiles to clients without requesting rewrites. Project descriptions were inconsistent, incomplete, and often unusable, triggering repeated back-and-forth that slowed business development and frustrated consultants.

Solution

An AI-assisted workflow embedded directly into the existing Consultant hub that evaluates project descriptions, explains quality gaps, and generates improved, client-ready versions before profiles reach senior review.

Impact

Rewrite cycles eliminated

Rewrite cycles eliminated

Rewrite cycles eliminated

Rewrite cycles eliminated

Senior leaders no longer needed to request manual rewrites for client-ready profiles.

Profile quality surfaced upfront

Profile quality surfaced upfront

Profile quality surfaced upfront

Profile quality surfaced upfront

Clear scoring and guidance made “client-ready” visible before profiles were shared.

Consultant time reclaimed

Consultant time reclaimed

Consultant time reclaimed

Consultant time reclaimed

Back-and-forth rewrites reduced by ~60%, saving ~24 hours per month.

Adopted across practices

Adopted across practices

Adopted across practices

Adopted across practices

Rolled out to 200+ profiles across five capability areas.

Full process, trade-offs, and artefacts explored in detail

ROLE

  • Senior Product Designer

  • Led end-to-end discovery, experience design, and AI workflow definition.

TIMEFRAME

  • 8-month internal engagement

TEAM

  • 3 Full Stack Engineers

  • Data Engineer

  • Quality Engineer

  • Stakeholders across 5 practice areas

BEFORE

Consultants entered project briefs with no guidance on quality or client readiness.

Consultants entered project briefs with no guidance on quality or client readiness.

Consultants entered project briefs with no guidance on quality or client readiness.

Consultants entered project briefs with no guidance on quality or client readiness.

AFTER

AI evaluates project write-ups against quality criteria and suggests a client-ready version inline.

AFTER

Side-by-side view shows what’s missing, why it scored that way, and how to improve it.

AFTER

Colour-coded scores surface which profiles are client-ready, without senior review or rewrites.

Want to talk through the work or see unreleased projects?